>> Want to See Ashley Olsen in Nylons?

April 21st, 2006 - Articles

Then catch the June 2006 issue of Nylon!

Fashionweekdaily.com

Nylon is shooting Ashley Olsen for their June cover today (lots of Cartier jewelry was called in, we hear)

Note: Comments are now in reverse order, newest first.

59 Comments

  1. se — July 13, 2008 @ 3:19 pm

    Ashley is ugly now but Mary kate is beutiful now

  2. Anonymous — October 15, 2007 @ 3:08 pm

    THATS LYDIA HEARST. HEIRESS TO HEARST FAMILY..YOUR SUCH A DUMBASS!!!!!!

  3. Anonymous — August 4, 2007 @ 2:40 pm

    dear
    marykate and ashley i love u . you,re awsome u rule dude . i am 10 but i dont have an account.could u parcel sweet 16 and your autograph . tomorrow to pakistan lahore in uppermall street n 176 is the no of the house. i am waiting. if u cant dial 5757725 or 5754525 . please parcel on sundaythe 5th
    :grin: :razz: by hiba no1 fan

  4. Susannah — November 5, 2006 @ 6:35 am

    I, Susannah, agree with number (/person) 2
    !! That is sooo not her: Ashley looks beautiful, but this person looks not like Ashley !!
    Ashley is beautiful (!) and I, Susannah, think she is a very nice and friendly person!
    (So is Mary-Kate !).
    Many kinds regards, to Ashley and also to Mary-Kate (Olsen). Love, Susannah Lively.

  5. MKA MAD — August 14, 2006 @ 4:48 pm

    Who is that any way:?: i bet its a really old photo:idea: or a really bad one:eek: :mrgreen: :!:

  6. Danace — July 7, 2006 @ 3:30 pm

    Exactly…! :roll:

  7. Anonymous — June 5, 2006 @ 6:31 am

    well we’re in june and ther’s no ash on the cover

  8. Anonymous — May 2, 2006 @ 10:29 am

    i agree

  9. emily — May 2, 2006 @ 10:28 am

    i think that looks more like Britney Spears,not Ashley

  10. Nickie — May 1, 2006 @ 6:44 pm

    PEOPLE CAN YOU NOT READ?

    THAT ISNT MEANT TO BE ASHLEY.
    (Bravo to everyone else)

  11. Kimbrly — April 30, 2006 @ 3:49 pm

    ThT IS definatally NOT Ashley!!:neutral: :mad:

  12. Ellie — April 29, 2006 @ 7:40 pm

    She’s not Ashley. Ashley is my favourite Olsen Twin, and she’s definetely not Ashley. It’s just an insult, more than likely.

  13. Rx olsenstars — April 29, 2006 @ 3:20 am

    So???? Do we care? Do we have to care?:shock: :mrgreen:

  14. ally — April 28, 2006 @ 8:28 am

    you can even tell that number 46 is a ******* fake cause that bitch spelled Ashley wrong

  15. ally — April 28, 2006 @ 8:25 am

    LIAR! you are so not not ashley! you just wish to be her, well,keep on dreaming!SOMEBODY COMMENT ON NUMBER 46:mad:

  16. Alica — April 27, 2006 @ 9:03 pm

    oh my godness…
    is that right???
    no it isn’t!!!

    YES WE NEED MORE NEWSSSSSSSSSSSS

  17. Ashley — April 27, 2006 @ 2:57 pm

    gosh!!!Ashley is not dAt UGLY!!!!!!:neutral:

  18. bmeashley — April 27, 2006 @ 9:30 am

    thats not ashley he no’s thats just the nylon thing duh he dont hav the ashley pic yet so stop callin her ugly if u do u must be f*cking ugly

  19. Anonymous — April 27, 2006 @ 2:36 am

    nice site :wink: awesome things are being uploaded or watever

  20. RX BAD BOY — April 26, 2006 @ 10:25 pm

    sorry for the big letters :mrgreen:

  21. RX BAD BOY — April 26, 2006 @ 10:24 pm

    WHO IS THAT LADY ON THE PICTURE? IT IS NOT RELATED TO ASHLEY IS IT?

  22. Nickie — April 26, 2006 @ 2:52 pm

    Is Nylon avalible in the uk?

  23. Michael Shipley — April 26, 2006 @ 12:25 pm

    that picture wasnt meant to represent ash..

  24. april*mary kate and ashley stalker* — April 25, 2006 @ 8:33 pm

    lol so true
    too many faces to pt on here…:lol:

  25. Tom — April 25, 2006 @ 1:35 am

    Comments number 32, 33 and 34: What were you thinking when you write your comments? Have you lost your head?

  26. Stephanie — April 24, 2006 @ 10:16 am

    Wow.
    People are idiots sometimes.

    I swear.

  27. Anonymous — April 24, 2006 @ 6:20 am

    :mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :idea: :grin: :oops: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :sad: :!: :!:

  28. Anonymous — April 24, 2006 @ 6:19 am

    :oops: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:HI:twisted: ::shock: :smile: :???: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :grin: :grin:

  29. Anonymous — April 24, 2006 @ 3:38 am

    I can’t wait, now is the time… I want to see her right now.
    June cover, you say… ok, that’s a long time to.

  30. Anonymous — April 23, 2006 @ 12:23 pm

    Yes. I want to see her in nylons. In nothing but nylons. Well, I already saw her in nylons. Nothing but nylons. But that was in a dream. Bad luck. When was it they wanted to release that dream-to-dvd device? :lol:

  31. asley olsen — April 23, 2006 @ 6:18 am

    that is sooo not me (i should know)

  32. atosa a olse-fan — April 23, 2006 @ 4:11 am

    THATS ABSOLUTLE NOT HER!!!!!!!!!!!!

  33. yoyo — April 23, 2006 @ 3:10 am

    please a wanna b look a like
    ash is more nice n beauty
    aka peaceout

  34. Anonymous — April 23, 2006 @ 1:42 am

    oooww this is not ash ?! :S

  35. Anonymous — April 23, 2006 @ 1:42 am

    oooww this is not ash ?! :S

  36. Anonymous — April 22, 2006 @ 7:44 pm

    hey

  37. Anonymous — April 22, 2006 @ 7:02 pm

    :!: :!: :!: :lol:

  38. amy — April 22, 2006 @ 5:58 pm

    yay!! i cant wait!

  39. jostamos — April 22, 2006 @ 3:50 pm

    MANDY mind ur own business dont put ur nose in others issue if ur an mka fan

  40. Anonymous — April 22, 2006 @ 8:12 am

    that for sure is not drew barrymore. Nylon certainly has changed, it never used to be the hollywood it girls…so much for the french. no more ludivine in nylon I guess

  41. eMsiE O — April 22, 2006 @ 7:42 am

    WE WANT NEWS!!!!!!! WE WANT NEWS!!!!! :mad:

  42. Lam — April 22, 2006 @ 6:37 am

    ooooo….Cartier jewellery!! im a bit obssessed! if i got 2 do a photoshoot id ask for no clothes, just order in a truck load of Cartier jewellery & drape myself in the stuff!! hehehe…wonder if ashley had the same idea?? :roll:

  43. Olsenfan — April 22, 2006 @ 6:13 am

    Wait a minute! I want my money back!!
    Something’s not right here!

  44. Rick Morris — April 22, 2006 @ 5:06 am

    That pic looks kinda like Drew Barrymore! Kinda! lol! I know, I know! This pic isn’t Ashley! That much is very very obvious to me! HaHa! It could be Drew Barrymore on a previous issue’s cover however! :mrgreen: :oops:

  45. Adi — April 22, 2006 @ 2:05 am

    Thats just negative:evil:

  46. Adi — April 22, 2006 @ 2:05 am

    Freaky that is definately not ashley.

  47. Mandy — April 22, 2006 @ 12:25 am

    For the tenthousend time, the girl in the picture is NOT ashley, (for those who can’t see).

    I also want to say to Michael that I like your site very much, i visit it everyday. And I also like your video’s, you’re a true MKA fan!

  48. jostamos — April 21, 2006 @ 9:39 pm

    that’s pic is bad is it ashley michael and do u mean by nylon

  49. Londongrl — April 21, 2006 @ 6:40 pm

    Look v v v closely n u will c that it aint ashley

  50. ari — April 21, 2006 @ 6:34 pm

    hey, sorry but i ve one qustion. is nylon a famouse magazin? or what kind of magazine is it?

  51. aimee — April 21, 2006 @ 4:52 pm

    hey
    its not even her.

  52. Marie-Kate — April 21, 2006 @ 3:34 pm

    Oh great! I’m sure the pictures will be cute!

  53. AHTOLLlKA — April 21, 2006 @ 2:04 pm

    need more news…

  54. MKA fan — April 21, 2006 @ 12:54 pm

    Thanks RUDD_JAM for your explination…
    (How do you whrite explination? (i´m sorry, i´m not English!)

    MKA are the best!:grin: :grin:

  55. RUDD_JAM — April 21, 2006 @ 12:05 pm

    Hey people if u have read what michael has said you would have read that she is soon is be shooting her picture for the next issue of the magazine. Which means that she hasn’t done it yet. Which also means that this was not her picture on the front page of this magazine cover of Nylon.

  56. belinda from Australia — April 21, 2006 @ 10:48 am

    What an insult!
    Ashley is not that ugly! But i am glad to be getting these emails everyday!
    Ashley is so beautiful!

  57. kissy — April 21, 2006 @ 10:03 am

    hey buddy, it isn’t supposed to be her.

  58. Anonymous — April 21, 2006 @ 9:14 am

    thats sooooo not her!!

  59. JENN — April 21, 2006 @ 9:09 am

    Im so glade to see that everything is up and running again. I really did miss getting the Olsen News everyday! :razz:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Note: Comments are now in reverse order, newest first.

 


Classic
Pictures  Video Clips  Music Videos  Audio Clips  Articles
Sitemap  Contact  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement