>>  New Better Quality Mary-Kate Olsen W Magazine Cover Photo

December 15th, 2005 - Photos

Here's a new very good quality version of Mary-Kate's W Magazine cover photo. The closer she gets the better she looks. Amazing. I heard she's thinking of buying the magazine itself. All she'd have to do is flip the W.


465x606 63k

Source: Netscape.com

35 Comments

Note: Comments are now in reverse order, newest first.
    "

    alli can say is sigh

    "
    losers — June 16, 2006 @ 11:41 pm
    "

    all the other girls want to be them but they are show ofs

    "
    Anonymous — June 16, 2006 @ 11:37 pm
    "

    :!: :?: :roll: mary kate looks ugly i mean she didnt have to put much makeuop i mean they are pretty already she putted to much makeup:sad:

    "
    Anonymous — June 16, 2006 @ 11:36 pm
    "

    i was sooo excited for this magazine.. just to find myself disappointed— only 2 pages - pictures of her.. on the cover, and the profile inside… i was like :Gasp: and they did 40 something on kate moss.. and 63 pages editoral photos on brad pitt and angelina jolie.. then 1 picture of marykate in magazine.. seriously! i want like 12 page spread.. but then i cant have everything

    "
    ker — May 7, 2006 @ 10:28 am
    "

    YOU WOULD LOOK BETTER IF YOU SHOWED YOUR WHOLE FACE AND STILL BE A BLONDIE ASHLEY LOOKS BETTER

    "
    I LOVE YOU OLSENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — January 21, 2006 @ 3:58 am
    "

    why don’t you go back to blondie hiar

    "
    i love you mk — January 20, 2006 @ 8:03 am
    "

    lookin gud!but i personally like her lokin normally but she loks soooooo pretty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i wish i was her!!!!

    "
    Anonymous — January 7, 2006 @ 3:59 am
    "

    …all I can say about the cover: *sigh*:wink:

    "
    jluvsmk — January 4, 2006 @ 7:05 am
    "

    Gorgeous …..
    love the eye make-up…
    just gorgeous!

    "
    gj czack — January 4, 2006 @ 1:33 am
    "

    Ste you said we have no british beauties,what about the stunning miss Knightly?Keira is GORGEOUS, but Olsens do rule!!

    "
    Fan — January 3, 2006 @ 3:31 am
    "

    :!: :smile: :???:those pictures look good of mk:wink:

    "
    numbe r one faann — December 29, 2005 @ 1:07 pm
    "

    is any-1 on :!:

    "
    Anonymous — December 29, 2005 @ 12:52 pm
    "

    :???:those pictures look good of mk:wink:

    "
    Anonymous — December 29, 2005 @ 12:52 pm
    "

    WOW:shock: more i can´t say about that pic!!:lol: :mrgreen:
    lots of love!!
    mandy:razz:

    "
    Mandy — December 24, 2005 @ 5:46 pm
    "

    heya,
    where a big fan of mary-kate and ashley we even told people that we where mary-kate and ashley and sian used to colect mary-kate and ashleys books and i still do now :smile:
    Kirsty used to collect you’r books and videos to and she’s got them culers and boobbles and that, that you wear cool ye!!!:lol: :!: :mrgreen:

    "
    kirsty and sian — December 23, 2005 @ 8:32 pm
    "

    is the magazine gonna be released in Australia? Coz we get crap magazines over here. I want that magazine!

    "
    emma — December 19, 2005 @ 10:44 am
    "

    :smile: i love Britney Spears

    "
    Ewelina — December 18, 2005 @ 6:28 am
    "

    uhh…what a beatiful eyes!!!! i need it…:D
    kisses

    "
    Gabi from Hungary — December 18, 2005 @ 4:49 am
    "

    cool i like tha pics of mk on tha cover on thw magazines
    aka peaceout

    "
    yoyo — December 16, 2005 @ 10:11 pm
    "

    I yast love them.:cool:
    I can say it 1000 of time but I yast say it one this time: I LOVE THEM!!!!! :mrgreen:

    "
    love — December 16, 2005 @ 8:39 pm
    "

    Loves it.
    her first cover - A must have for the ultimate Mary-kate fan.
    shes great.

    "
    E Lo — December 16, 2005 @ 7:15 am
    "

    So sweet!!:shock:

    "
    Olsenfan — December 16, 2005 @ 6:54 am
    "

    wouldn’t she receive a complimentary copy?

    "
    Anonymous — December 16, 2005 @ 5:02 am
    "

    Ste- When you wake up and look whats around you.

    "
    RUDD_JAM — December 16, 2005 @ 4:12 am
    "

    what a nice pic:grin:

    "
    kelly — December 16, 2005 @ 3:39 am
    "

    Elle est trop belle Mk sur cette tof

    "
    Alice — December 16, 2005 @ 3:27 am
    "

    yay:shock:

    "
    KaroLine, or whatever — December 15, 2005 @ 9:28 pm
    "

    YO, y is it dat USA gets all da prtty gals? Where r da British heart-stoppers? u american guys get J-Lo, Jenny Aniston and not 4getting the most sxy, olsen girls. wot hav we British got? Whn r we gonna c some friggin’ sxy british girls? WHEN????

    "
    ste — December 15, 2005 @ 7:33 pm
    "

    psc!!! michael u r best!!!

    "
    rx bad boy — December 15, 2005 @ 7:17 pm
    "

    Found it:

    http://channels.netscape.com/celebrity/bigpic.jsp?photoid=20051211LOS02D.jpg&this=0&searchpage=search.jsp&cap=mary-kate+olsen&w=ap+or+reuters+or+afp%2Fgetty+images&max=8&first=&fs=&floc=wn-np

    AND it says in the caption:

    “The issue was available in New York on December 10 and will be nationwide on December 23.”

    So WTF? Where are the scans? Does no one in NY have a scanner? Maybe one guy bought’em all and is going to sell them on ebay?

    "
    Michael Shipley — December 15, 2005 @ 3:03 pm
    "

    yeah who knows where it came from?

    supposedly the magazine has been released in NY, but i don’t believe it. if it had, we’d have scans by now! there are plenty of psycho obsessed fans there (who probably moved to the city just to be close to ashley or something, haha) and they would have scanned it.

    is there anyone here from NYC who has personally seen the magazine out there?

    "
    ellyn — December 15, 2005 @ 2:36 pm
    "

    what did?

    "
    teisha — December 15, 2005 @ 12:40 pm
    "

    omg thankyou! :mrgreen:

    "
    Kat — December 15, 2005 @ 11:26 am
    "

    I wonder where it came from. Must of been leaked somehow.

    "
    Michael Shipley — December 15, 2005 @ 10:53 am
    "

    gorgeous! thank you.

    "
    ellyn — December 15, 2005 @ 10:47 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Note: Comments are now in reverse order, newest first.