21 Comments

Make a comment

• ich bin ein riesen Olsen Twinis fan
  I am a Olsen twins fan
  Mary-kate and ashley is Beautifull
  Dear colleagues
  in search of contact
  i search over all Olsen twins producs
  we can to switch
  i live in Torgau is in germany
  here not that much products by den Olsen twins.
  it would be of great helt to me .at to switch.
  my adress is
  bea-desi@web.de
  Suche nette brieffreunde
  all sorts of people to the write
  my number is 01754949023

  olsen twins fan — May 28, 2006 @ 3:12 pm

• :cry:boys are stupid:cry: i m so mad at a boy now:evil: :cry:i lost my love….:cry: :sad:dont now what happend:roll:

  Anonymous — April 26, 2006 @ 2:24 am

• i love you mary-kate:lol:you are the cooest person in the wotld:razz:and you also hot:oops:hehe:wink:

  Anonymous — April 26, 2006 @ 2:20 am

• MK DOSENT LIKE TO BE FOTOGRAFED IF SHE DONT NOW!:sad: SO HAVE BAD TO THEM DONT FOTOGRAFE THEM!

  mka lover — April 2, 2006 @ 6:52 pm

• i did not like the mobile i have the new nokia N70 :cool:its so better than the black berry :cool:and alot smaller

  the best — February 5, 2006 @ 7:52 pm

• Once you go back, you’ll never go black!

  Jim Sheridan — December 26, 2005 @ 9:20 am

• estela the phone she used in new york minute was t mobile sidekick (sidekick 1)

  vvbnbvbn — November 20, 2005 @ 12:19 am

• i don’t like her phone and we can’t say that she seems better, we don’t see her face….:???:

  mina — June 6, 2005 @ 5:37 am

• does anyone know what mobile phone mary-kate use in The New York Minute ?:???:

  estela — May 17, 2005 @ 11:37 pm

• THAT WAS FUNNY MARY KATE THANKS I,D TELL MY NAME EXCEPT I,M TRY BE FREINDLY THANKS MARY KATE

  Anonymous — April 30, 2005 @ 8:24 am

• my brother has a has this mobile.

  to bad i don’t. i have a sony ericsson.

  daanish — April 28, 2005 @ 11:59 pm

• Mk is beautiful

  étoile — April 28, 2005 @ 11:57 pm

• I know one olsen-twins-news!!!!!!!
  Mary-Kate have a very nice mobile phone, i have NOKIA 3100 and I’m very happy:grin:

  Poland — April 28, 2005 @ 7:17 pm

• does anyone know any good page of mka??:smile:

  rita — April 28, 2005 @ 6:19 pm

• Thats against privacy its gone over the top but nice phone

  khaleel — April 28, 2005 @ 2:40 pm

• Yes there are horror stories galore on how the unscrupulous media make millions at the expense of celebrities. It is way out of hand and I’m surprised nothing is being done about it. Probably because celebrities are in the minority and the majority love it.

  For anyone interested here’s an article I read on how in the US celebrities have less rights than civilians when it comes to their privacy:

  http://people.howstuffworks.com/paparazzi6.htm

  Michael Shipley — April 28, 2005 @ 12:11 pm

• It wouldn’t suprise me if things were the same over here. Thats messed up though, permission should be manditory to all people.

  I feel sorry for David Beckham (he’s an England football player), what most people care about is that he does his best on the football pitch. People couldn’t care less about his marrige problems, but u know magazines, they dont listen. He’s took some magazine to court for publishing a 7 page article about his “marrige problems”, he should buy and sell their sorry ass n fire the d*ckhead who done the article.
  Sadly Beckham is just 1 celeb in a load who get tourtured this way, “thanks for getting us through the qualifiers David(!)”. Then they backstab him the next week, because there are rumors of him cheatin on his wife, like I care…

  … Oh yea Olsen Twinz rule!

  Downcount — April 28, 2005 @ 11:35 am

• What needs to be done is to take the profit out of it. If they couldn’t sell their photos that would solve the problem. You can take a photo but you can’t sell it. Did you know that in America celebrities have less rights than ordinary civilians? In America, ordinary civilians need to be asked permission to print their photos but not celebrities! Why do celebrities have less rights? How would society be hurt if we didn’t see paparazzi photos. Not one bit.

  Michael Shipley — April 28, 2005 @ 11:14 am

• Fair play. Sometimes it’s right to take a photo, say at a movie premiere. But not on a car park! I mean I MK or A wouldn’t mind if you just said “Hi” to them or at the most ask for their autographs if they aren’t busy. But running around them in circles with a 1000 watt flash going off has got to get to you. I mean it must be terrible in some ways, not being able to escape it.
  I mean Maddonna tryed to come & live over here (UK) to escape that sort of thing. But they are just as bad over here! So the best way to get MK & A or any celeb to like you is destroy the newspaper offices! :twisted:, i’ll start in London…

  Downcount — April 28, 2005 @ 10:27 am

• It must be maddening I agree. There should be a law where you can’t sell a persons photo unless they give permission. Bye bye paparazzi.

  Michael Shipley — April 28, 2005 @ 10:05 am

• Nice phone! MK looks even better! But I dont see the need for cameras to follow her around everywhere, I mean come on a car park, i’d be p*ssed off by now with it.

  Downcount — April 28, 2005 @ 9:55 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

No registration required.

Name (not required)

Mail (not required)

Website (not required)