>> Fan Review of Factory Girl

January 3rd, 2007 - Articles

Here's a review of Factory Girl from the perspective of a Mary-Kate and Ashley fan.

"Ok guys, I saw Factory Girl yesterday. It was only in one theatre in LA, and so it was ok but the MK situation is weird. So i like put all my effort into keeping my eyes out for her and in this one party scene that really is a conversation between Edie and Andy W., I saw MK- she was in the BACKGROUND!! SHE WAS AN EXTRA!!! She looked cute and whatever, but not only did she have no lines, she was completely in the background for no more than 3 seconds. I wouldn't say she had a supporting role at all- we were misled! it was so depressing. but whatever it was an ok movie."

source: Mkaolsen

read the comments at livejournal  here.

Search Olsen Twins NEWS

20 Comments

Make a comment

Note: Comments are now in reverse order, newest first.
  1. I don’t know how often maybe it was one of those one off moments.

    Just JAM — January 6, 2007 @ 3:15 pm
  2. i cannot say. I don’t want to spread rumours for Mary-kate’s behalf. All I can say is that she parties wild.

    Just JAM — January 6, 2007 @ 3:13 pm
  3. well she made it farther than her sister and that is way awesome, go mk!

    april*mk and ash stalker* — January 6, 2007 @ 7:01 am
  4. “U may already know but I was on a train and i saw a newspaper on the floor repoting about Olsen so i picked it up and it was a report and picture about Mary-kate and what she did one night.”

    What did she do? Comment #14

    Anonymous — January 6, 2007 @ 1:34 am
  5. thats cool very cool
    aka peaceout

    yoyo — January 5, 2007 @ 9:55 am
  6. :sad: that sucks

    liya — January 4, 2007 @ 6:01 am
  7. U may already know but I was on a train and i saw a newspaper on the floor repoting about Olsen so i picked it up and it was a report and picture about Mary-kate and what she did one night.

    Just JAM — January 4, 2007 @ 5:47 am
  8. Okay,in my opinion..I guess writing about that in their Blog will just make her feel disappointed. I mean,even if we’ll say positive comments,she would still remember about this whole thing! Lets just make her feel like nothing has happened. That would be better, i guess…..

    Danace — January 4, 2007 @ 1:09 am
  9. That is so0o SAD =( i’m sure,she’s really disappointed in this. Don’t worry Mk & Ash..we’re always here for the both of you.

    Danace — January 4, 2007 @ 1:03 am
  10. :evil:THEY JUST WANT US 2 BUY IT! BOICOT IT!!!!!MK DESERVS BETTER… but why would she do it?:sad:She’s totally born 2 be the main caracter.. no dubt about it!

    Michelle — January 4, 2007 @ 12:20 am
  11. They have everything they need. Why don’t we write comments on their offical blog about that(cutely)?:idea: I guess we are more than 30 people:smile:

    bba — January 3, 2007 @ 11:51 pm
  12. Hey you are absolutely right. They can make their own film.

    bba — January 3, 2007 @ 11:45 pm
  13. this sux. they deserve a leading role.
    n michael, “i think the mistake they’re making is thinking that because nym didnt do well that they should quit producing their own movies.”

    I liked nym! it was cool.
    they shld definately produce more movies starring themselves.

    Anonymous — January 3, 2007 @ 6:48 pm
  14. well thats the way the cookie crumbles

    Adi — January 3, 2007 @ 6:47 pm
  15. everybody hv their downs

    eli — January 3, 2007 @ 6:02 pm
  16. i think the mistake they’re making is thinking that because nym didnt do well that they should quit producing their own movies. a lot of actors create their own production companies to make movies they want to make and to have more control. they can make more mature movies separately just produce it themselves.

    “that sucks.. MK should deserve the leading role :wink:… anyway , i hope she or Ashley turns up in an big movie with a big role soon!! :!: :!:”

    Michael Shipley — January 3, 2007 @ 5:19 pm
  17. that sucks.. MK should deserve the leading role :wink:… anyway , i hope she or Ashley turns up in an big movie with a big role soon!! :!: :!:

    Romy — January 3, 2007 @ 4:53 pm
  18. OMG just in the backgr0und?! dat is s0ooo n0t fair:cry:

    Trishala — January 3, 2007 @ 11:41 am
  19. well originally she had a small supporting role, but after she had a dispute with the director or someone they cut her part from the movie altogether.

    Katie — January 3, 2007 @ 8:53 am
  20. :(

    kstny — January 3, 2007 @ 8:41 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

No registration required.

 

Recent Comments

Make a comment