NEW! 24Olsen. Stay up to date on Mary-Kate and Ashley, every hour, on the hour.

News

Videos

eBay

Feeds updated every hour on the hour...

>> Crybaby Reporters Complain about Poor Mary-Kate

July 21st, 2007 - Articles, Weeds

Excuse my language but this really irritates the living f%ck out of me:

Bill Brioux: "Acting like an adult was not a priority for Olsen on this day"

According to an article in Variety and others it seems that the vultures reporters at the Weeds TCA press conference were irked that they couldn’t spend the whole Weeds press conference  grilling poor little Mary-Kate about all that juicy gossip that seems to swirl around her and Ashley like a pack of (f)lies. The reporters cried like babies and had the nerve to call her immature for trying to put the spotlight  back onto Weeds where it belonged.

Earth to sleazy crybaby reporters: grow yourself up ya morons. 

Variety

…Showtime may have hoped to lure in younger viewers when it signed on Mary-Kate Olsen for a role on "Weeds." But it couldn’t have been thrilled with the press reaction to the former child star.

Olsen looked somnolent, barely mumbling answers to the many questions she was asked, and distracted from talk about the series. The media got so perturbed (Canadian columnist Bill Brioux: "Acting like an adult was not a priority for Olsen on this day") that exec producer Jenji Kohan had to interrupt, "Let’s talk about ‘Weeds.’ "

Note: Comments are now in reverse order, newest first.

15 Comments

  1. rachel — November 16, 2007 @ 7:14 am

    hi mi 2 bbesz luv ya all but i need ya email address if ya want mine heres mine:rachlove95@hotmail.co.uk :smile: evrytime!!!!!!!!! luv ya + i’m a big fan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!luv ya loadsz oxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxxxxxxxxxxxx

  2. Anonymous — November 11, 2007 @ 10:54 pm

    ooooooooooooh :cry:

  3. JAMIE — July 23, 2007 @ 11:45 am

    DONT LEAVE MICHAEL THIS SITE ROX!!!!!!

  4. Danace — July 22, 2007 @ 1:35 pm

    We hate it..or maybe it’s just me, cause whenever i see them on the front page of a tabloid magazines and for example the title says “Mary-Kate Collapses or Ashley Olsen Caught On Drug Scandal”..i DON’T buy them,because i don’t trust Tabloid Magazines,why would i waste my money for that trash?! It probably depends on the person..if they want to support the media or not. And i DON’T support them.

    And for the paparazzi pictures,we’re not the ones who buy the pics,it’s just that we cannot avoid them,cause they’re all over the net and even if you don’t go to some paparazzi websites,the photos would leak and we’ll see them but still that doesn’t mean that we support them. If you really are a fan of MKA,i’ll tell you guys..you should not buy their magazines,don’t waste your money!

  5. Just JAM — July 22, 2007 @ 12:27 pm

    If they did then they would be fooling themselves cause they would not make any money and it wouldn’t benefit their pay.

  6. Just JAM — July 22, 2007 @ 12:19 pm

    cause the media only writes that is BAD! Cause obviously that’s what really sells and we fans hate that!

    yes but they would not sell it if the fans didn’t like it.

  7. Danace — July 22, 2007 @ 11:41 am

    first of all..people hate what they write,cause the media only writes that is BAD! Cause obviously that’s what really sells and we fans hate that! and about the pics,yes i have to admit that they’re also a good thing to us fans but they’re awful to MKA!

  8. Michael Shipley — July 22, 2007 @ 8:46 am

    “why on earth did you have to post a picture of busH? - Comment by Anonymous “

    because i thought it fit and i thought it was funny and a little off the wall.

  9. Just JAM — July 22, 2007 @ 6:27 am

    Hey guess who they r doing it for. u Guys. They know u guys want to hear and read about the Olsen twins 24/7 and that makes them money to sell their stuff to u about them so I don’t know why u all criticise the media for. Im sure that when they hit the questions to Mary-kate they know that is what sells.

    If they weren’t there u wouldn’t hear from or c pics of the Olsen twins and I know u wouldn’t want that.

  10. Danace — July 21, 2007 @ 11:11 pm

    Exactly..Michael, and it is soo NOT fair to MK! I wish the media would stop talking sh*t about her!! Cause you never know with MK..she might explode and give em what they really want,and that’s sad. :sad:

  11. Anonymous — July 21, 2007 @ 10:38 pm

    why on earth did you have to post a picture of busH?

  12. Michael Shipley — July 21, 2007 @ 8:20 pm

    @Erin

    ha! good idea erin. if they want to make it all about her then at least she should benefit from it.

  13. Erin — July 21, 2007 @ 8:08 pm

    That’s ridiculous! Stupid reporters think they deserve the right to ask any questions they want because the people they are interviewing are FAMOUS. This event WASN’T about Mary-Kate, it was about WEEDS.

    if you want MK to answer these questions, give her a front page spread in your magazine. about HER.

  14. Michael Shipley — July 21, 2007 @ 4:20 pm

    @danace

    exactly! and it went on and on as if she was the only one there and mary-kate knew it was taking attention away from the other cast members and the show itself so she got a little irritated and started deflecting more and more questions which of course made the reporters angry since they knew they’ll get more juice reporting on her than the show itself. what makes me angry is they had the nerrrrrrrrve to get all upset at HER about it and accused HER of acting immaturely when it was the exact opposite: mary-kate was acting supremely mature in wanting whats best for the show and not herself. ironic.

  15. Danace — July 21, 2007 @ 4:03 pm

    I read this somewhere that the one reporter asked if her celebrity as an Olsen twin has cost her some acting jobs. I mean,that’s really offensive and a very immature question. :roll:
    So,probably that’s the reason why MK became disinterested. The Medias are full of cr*p!!! :evil:

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Note: Comments are now in reverse order, newest first.